Ricky McGraw’s New Federal Lawsuit | Property Insurance Coverage Law Blog

What happened

The 2021 investigation, the 2023 reopening, Judge McHugh’s intervening ruling, the allegedly missing evidence, the estimates, the sworn proof of loss, the identity of the complainant, and communications among Tower Hill, its lawyers, and DFS are now likely to receive considerably more scrutiny. McGraw alleges that Tower Hill personnel, its lawyers, and DFS investigators continued communicating, strategizing, and pursuing a criminal case until a second investigation resulted in charges against him in 2023. In May 2023, Circuit Judge Michael McHugh ruled against SFR in the Rookery Pointe litigation and found that material information concerning SFR’s subcontractor arrangement had been concealed or misrepresented.

Key details

• McGraw alleges that Tower Hill personnel, its lawyers, and DFS investigators continued communicating, strategizing, and pursuing a criminal case until a second investigation resulted in charges against him in 2023.
• In May 2023, Circuit Judge Michael McHugh ruled against SFR in the Rookery Pointe litigation and found that material information concerning SFR’s subcontractor arrangement had been concealed or misrepresented.
• Even more curiously, the complaint alleges that January 2024 emails show investigator Rebecca Prince-Swift discussing that CRU estimate and recognizing that it was closer to SFR’s sworn proof of loss.

Why it matters to restoration

This belongs on an operator’s radar because insurance behavior sets the rules for documentation, scope disputes, cash flow and customer expectations. If the article points to a carrier, court or coverage trend, the practical question is what proof your next file needs before the argument starts.

What to check next

Check whether your estimates, photos, notes and customer updates would survive the same dispute described in the article.

Read original article ↗