California is writing the country's first smoke damage standard, and it will license the people who do the work
A bill now in the California Senate would force the state to set testing and remediation standards for smoke-damaged homes and certify the contractors who do it.
AB 1795, the Smoke Damage Recovery Act, authored by Assemblymember Mike Gipson with Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara, was introduced February 10, 2026, amended five times in the Assembly, passed it, and was amended in the Senate on July 2, 2026. It directs CalEPA to develop health-based standards by June 30, 2027 for minimum sampling, testing, and chemical screening levels on smoke-damaged residential property, including pre-remediation and post-remediation testing protocols. By January 1, 2028 the state must establish training and certification requirements for the professionals who inspect, test, and remediate those homes, along with implementing regulations and certification fees. On the carrier side it bars terminating additional living expenses before a home is cleared for habitation, requires insurers to cover the cost of the sampling and testing the standards require, sets a 30-day inspection clock from notice of claim, requires actual cash value within 30 days of inspection and replacement cost within 15 days of receiving contractor contracts, and requires insurers to verify that contractors hold proper state licensing and certification. The driver: more than 42,000 wildfire claims from January to November 2025, over 13,000 of them on homes left standing with smoke damage.
Why it matters
Smoke is the one loss type where there has never been a number to argue from. You say the structure is contaminated, the carrier says it needs a wipe down, and the dispute has no floor because no standard exists. This creates one, with a date on it. Read the second deadline carefully: January 1, 2028 is a certification requirement for anyone inspecting, testing, or remediating smoke damage in California, which is the same shape as Connecticut's October mold mandate except in the largest restoration market in the country. If you are certified it is a moat. If you are not it is an eviction notice. And the insurer obligation to verify your licensing means the carrier becomes the enforcement mechanism on your paperwork. California standards do not stay in California: this is the template other states copy.
The read
You have spent years arguing that a house full of smoke is damaged, against an adjuster who wanted to call it cleaning. California is about to hand you a number instead of an opinion, and then require the carrier to check your certification before it pays you. That second part is the one to act on. Find the certification path this quarter, because when it becomes mandatory the people already holding it will set the price.
Read next
Sources California Department of Insurance, www.insurance.ca.gov/0400-news/0100-press-re… (published ) and the unveiling release, www.insurance.ca.gov/0400-news/0100-press-re… (published ). Bill text and status: California Legislature, AB 1795, leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClie…. Trade coverage: Insurance Journal, www.insurancejournal.com/news/west/2026/03/1… and Claims Journal, www.claimsjournal.com/news/national/2026/03/….
Regulator/Gov primary, the state insurance regulator and the bill text itself, with trade press for corroboration. High confidence