The Oklahoma AG filed suit against Allstate alleging a company-wide scheme to minimize wind and hail payouts (restrictive internal damage standards, centralized reviewers overriding field adjusters, outcome-oriented engineering reports) and is seeking restitution, disgorgement, civil penalties, and structural relief under consumer-protection and racketeering (RICO-style) theories. In a companion post, Merlin argues State Farm's hail-adjusting training (a "Hail Focus Initiative," Haag courses, a 71-page training-record exhibit from an Alabama case, an internal "water-shedding ability or life expectancy" damage definition) is the kind of material that becomes central evidence when what a carrier trains diverges from what the policy promises. Florida, by contrast, "splits the file" across OIR, DFS, and a mostly-sidelined AG, so no single official owns pattern detection.
Why it matters
This is the exact underpayment behavior you fight on hail and wind files, now named by a state's top prosecutor as a scheme rather than a coverage disagreement. If discovery forces the training binders into the open, every PA and contractor gets a documented map of how "functional damage" and centralized review are used to shave scope.
The read
A landmark suit invites you to wait for the ruling, and rulings like this take years. The leverage is not the verdict, it is discovery. Once the training material is in the open, it is a document you can cite on a hail supplement this quarter regardless of how Oklahoma ends. Watch the docket, save what becomes public, and build the citation into your hail dispute template.
Verisk's Q1 2026 property data shows residential claim volume down 8.9% year over year and total claims 13.1% below the five-year average, despite active catastrophes. Verisk attributes the drop to policy design: ACV-only loss settlement endorsements, percentage deductibles (a 2% deductible turning a $3,000 water loss into no claim), and wind/hail deductibles now used "almost always." Water is 31.1% of claims and rising; hail claims fell 23.6%; average severity hit $16,079; roof replacement costs rose 33% in 2025.
Why it matters
This is the mechanism behind last week's "fewer but bigger" data. It's not that damage stopped. Deductibles and ACV language are killing the small-to-mid water and hail jobs before a homeowner ever calls you, while the losses that do become claims are larger and more complex.
The read
A soft quarter is the comfortable explanation, and it lets you wait for a rebound. Verisk named the levers itself: percentage deductibles, wind and hail deductibles, and value-only settlement language that kill the small claim before a homeowner ever calls you. That floor is permanent. Reprice your small-loss work for cash-pay customers, and move capacity toward the large losses that still clear the filter.
The 2025 P&C combined ratio improved 3.6 points to 93, underwriting income jumped to $61.2B from $23B, and premiums grew 5% to $1.11T. Personal lines drove it: homeowners multiperil recovered from a $1.5B underwriting loss in 2024 to $16.8B in income, and private-passenger auto more than doubled to $28.9B. Commercial liability lagged, with "other liability" posting an $11B loss on social inflation.
Why it matters
This is the context that makes the two stories above land. The homeowners line that's non-renewing your customers and tightening deductibles just had its most profitable year on record. When a carrier tells you money's tight on your supplement, the industry's own scoreboard says otherwise.
The read
A hardening market rewarding discipline is the tidy story. Put it next to the claim volume drop in the same quarter and a different picture shows up: record homeowners profit while fewer claims got paid at all. That is the best number to have on hand when an adjuster pleads poverty on your supplement. Print the combined ratio and the underwriting income, and keep them in the file.
NOAA's outlook calls for a below-average 8 to 14 named storms and 1 to 3 major hurricanes as El Niño suppresses Atlantic activity. The piece argues that's cold comfort: coastal exposure has ballooned (40M+ more coastal residents since 1970, reconstruction costs up 60 to 70% in a decade), so one landfall in Miami, Tampa, or Houston is a $100B+ event even in a quiet year. It cites 1992 (half the normal storms, but Hurricane Andrew) versus 2020 (record 30 storms, only ~$30B because they missed population). El Niño also raises southern-US rainfall, flood, and landslide risk.
Why it matters
Don't let a "below-average" headline set your staffing or standby posture. Water and flood demand can spike from the rainfall pattern alone, and a single major landfall reshuffles the entire national resource market overnight.
The read
A below-average forecast is the most dangerous sentence a restorer can read, because it sets staffing on a count. Storm count is a vanity metric for your business. One landfall on a major metro reshuffles the national resource market overnight, and the rainfall pattern drives inland flooding regardless. Use the quiet stretch to lock standby agreements, crew commitments and equipment, while nobody else is bidding.